Rhino Records HomeStore News And Notes Fun About Rhino Help My Cart
CDs DVD and Video Vinyl Store Collectibles: Rhino HandmadeWireless: Music for your cell phone
Newsletter

Sign up here and we'll let you know what’s up

(optional)
HTML Text
More Lefsetz Articles

[1] comment


The Lefsetz Letter

Living With War

by Bob Lefsetz

The most important thing about Neil Young's new album is how fast it was cut.

Talk to a major label honcho today. It'll crack you up. They're on a GLACIAL pace. They want you to cut demos. Co-write. Work with different producers. And then, even when your album is finished, they plot a release date with more thought than Rumsfeld and the President employed deciding when to invade Iraq. As a result, by time the music reaches the public it's so homogenized, so bland, so OVER that that people shrug and ignore it. Or, if it does hit, no one takes it seriously. It would be like going to couples-counseling with someone you broke up with two years ago.

One hopes to make music that will last forever. Ironically, you can only do this if you forget the future and do what feels right now. Furthermore, we're all just a blip in the history of the world, so the music is inherently evanescent, and it's best to treat it that way.

And, once a record is finished, the marketing campaign is ALSO plotted and executed with more aforethought than Rumsfeld, et al, employed. There are electronic presskits. Videos. Appearances on MTV/"The Today Show"/ET. Articles about the record in every publication known to man. It's carpet-bombing of the worst order. And, consumers hate the major labels for it the same way the Vietnamese still hate America. And the Iraqis too. God, if only labels were paid for their exposure campaigns rather than the music they released...THEN they wouldn't be in the economic doldrums.

Instead of all this b.s., one should just put the record up on your Website for everybody to hear. When it's FINISHED! If you're lucky, listeners will care, and you can create some new music when the inspiration arrives, and they'll be interested in that. Yup, if he weren't Neil Young his record label wouldn't let him release this record. Because it comes too close on the heels of the PREVIOUS ONE, "Prairie Wind". You've got to maximize profits. Have the CD in the marketplace when the movie goes to DVD and cable. You don't want to confuse the customer. You've got to keep it easy, feed it to them like pabulum. Don't respect listeners, play to the lowest common denominator, one step above mental retardation. You don't want to leave anybody out in your endless sales effort. Even though by time you get done flogging the record to every known human being, over and over, NOBODY wants to have anything to do with the act EVER AGAIN!

Neil Young's been coasting on his reputation for eons. Those remakes of Harvest...creepy. Oh, "Greendale" was a return to form, it made one hope. But the story was so HOKEY! That's what happens when you lack inspiration.

Neil's inspired now. You can HEAR IT IN HIS MUSIC!

Fire up http://www.neilyoung.com/. You'll hear the energy, the spark that's been lacking for DECADES! Neil's pissed, and as a result he's created great work.

I'm only four tracks into the stream. And so far, the first track, "After The Garden", is the best. Maybe someday I'll get through the whole album. But the fact that you can't fast-forward, that you can't take the music away from your computer, shows that technological Luddites are still involved. So, you want to make it hard for the listener, so you can sell a couple of hundred thousand albums, in a land of HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS? I hate to tell you, but the more people who hear the music, who have the MP3s, the MORE CDs you're going to sell. I know, it's counterintuitive, but it's fact. When TV producers are streaming the hell out of their shows, experimenting with new forms of distribution, the record companies are STILL testing the waters. It's kind of like the Administration and global warming. There are still DOUBTERS!

Believe me, most people don't give a shit about Neil Young. He's a has-been. Yup, to a kid that's a fact. He's SIXTY! And the jamming with Pearl Jam was over a decade ago. If he wants to stay relevant, he's got to loosen the screws. And let his music OUT!

As for touring with Crosby, Stills and Nash, one could say this is a bad time, then again, check Neil's grosses, they've fallen off.

Neil should be playing this music anywhere people will have him. Not talking about the inspiration on TV, just strumming/picking his guitar, letting it ALL OUT! Letting the music speak. Giving away on his Website MP3s of every live performance.

Bruce Springsteen is one of us. Maybe that's what put a dent in his career. He used to be the loner. But now, he's playing the role of the accepted one. Whereas Neil BEFITS the moniker of one of his greatest songs. This loner is a prick who does whatever feels right. And that's EXACTLY what we want from an artist. A lightning rod. Hell, you pay attention when the bolts start flying through the sky. When was the last time you stopped in your tracks and paid attention to an artist?

It's astounding. Thirty six years after writing and cutting a song in a week Neil's back at it. Radio's not the same, don't expect to hear any of the tracks from "Living With War" ubiquitously over the airwaves. It's hard to rise above the din. Maybe that's why Bush and his cronies got away with their activities for so long. But thank god someone is finally standing up. We've got to stand up.

Actually, the public has been standing up to the major labels for six and a half years. It's just that the corporations don't realize it. Traders are pirates just like Neil Young and Bill Maher and the Dixie Chicks are traitors. Think about it.

Bob Lefsetz, Santa Monica-based industry legend, is the author of the e-mail newsletter, "The Lefsetz Letter". Famous for being beholden to no one, and speaking the truth, Lefsetz addresses the issues that are at the core of the music business: downloading, copy protection, pricing and the music itself. His intense brilliance captivates readers from Steven Tyler to Rick Nielsen to Bryan Adams to Quincy Jones to EVERYBODY who's in the music business. Never boring, always entertaining, Mr. Lefsetz's insights are fueled by his stint as an entertainment business attorney, majordomo of Sanctuary Music's American division and consultancies to major labels.

While Rhino may occasionally disagree with some of Bob's opinions, we certainly agree with his right to state them. At the bottom of each column we give you, the reader, the opportunity to respond and we encourage you to do so. We will post select comments.


LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

A word about submissions: We post what you give us, so please don't include your email address or any personal info. Your comments reach Rhino, not necessarily the writer, so don't expect a reply from them (or us, see our help section for contact info). We gather and post your submissions in batches, so do expect a short delay. And don't get bent if we edit your comments. We probably won't, but we reserve that right.


Comments:

That disclaimer above, "Rhino may occasionally disagree with some of Bob's opinions we ... agree with his right to state them" shows that liberals have a paranoid obsession with censorship. You can't debate a liberal on any subject without hearing that statement uttered in some form or another during the conversation. Relax; go toke some weed. Nobody is trying to censor you, or Neil Young, or any liberal. News about Neil Young's new album and The Dixie Chicks statements are everywhere contradicting your assessment that they were being censored, although you never said that word.

Censorship is what happens in China when people that disagree with the government really are censored and even killed, this is just part of the game. Rock musicians exploit young people that worship rock stars because they know nothing at that point in their lives except that they like music and sports and therefore those who perform them. They push their left-wing beliefs on their impressionable minds and you think this is just great, but when radio execs use "their" influence not play music that they disagree with on the stations that "they" own you cry censorship. Shut up and play the game and stop crying about the referees, or the crowd, or the field conditions and you would get more respect from "middle America".

The Dixie Chicks being censored by Clear Channel was an urban legend. Their records were pulled from some country stations in the reddest sections of the red states. If a musician uttered something anti-Jewish and their records were pulled from a New York radio stations because they pissed off their audience is that censorship too? Why can't liberals just have debates and defend the merits of their arguments without having to pollute the debate with outside bullshit.




Let I Bleed Book

What's Inside the Rhino Magazine

Subscribe to Feed

Subscribe in Bloglines

home :: news & notes :: store :: about rhino :: fun stuff :: help :: my cart :: privacy policy :: terms of service